Claude Code for engineering teams

Your developers have Claude Code.Most of it goes unused.

The license is the easy part. The edge is developers who know how to use it: directing an agent through real, complex work instead of asking it for one-line fixes. I'm a software engineer who trains teams to get there, then to work that way together.

The difference

It isn't the tool. It's how it's used.

Before

$ claude

› fix the typo in the nav

  Done. "Contnact" → "Contact" in Nav.tsx

Most developers use it like fancy autocomplete.

After

$ claude

› migrate our auth to the new token flow

  across all three services, with tests

● Mapped 14 files, traced the call graph

● Drafted a 6-step plan, 2 steps reversible

● Building step 3/6 · updating refresh logic

● Tests green, 28 passed

Yours will direct it through real, complex work.

The path

One developer, then the whole team.

Built from my two developer workshops, sequenced into a single Claude Code path. Start anywhere in it.

Developer mastery

Your developers go past autocomplete: directing Claude Code through complex, multi-file work, managing context and cost, and putting the advanced features to real use.

Team adoption

The whole team works the same way. Shared CLAUDE.md files, agreed conventions, repo-level config, and workflows that make Claude Code a multiplier across the codebase.

Rollout support

I stay with you through the rollout, so the practices hold after the session and spread past the people who were in the room.

Put the tool your team already pays for to work.

Let's talk →

Rolling AI out past engineering? See consulting →